# Revised site plan — November 2, 2026

Research/examination use is the priority, as requested by Ian G. Williams. The two AI sub-agent critiques and the additional five-persona simulation are review hypotheses, not human participant evidence.

## Orientation, credit and roster evidence

Status: implemented; checked in release validation.

- Sourced GCDI/Fellows introduction and project-status statement
- Author-first entry and contact
- Distinct record/model/register populations
- Selection-specific provisional-credit counts
- Semester-level signed-list coverage

## Interpretation and source coverage

Status: implemented.

- 19 export-verified passages
- Five additional posts from 2018–2022
- Purposive-selection and remaining zero-year coverage account
- Historically situated AI, pandemic, ownership and governance qualifications
- Multimodal and curation limits

## Research journeys and sharing

Status: implemented; browser checks recorded separately.

- Package index front door
- Read / Explore / How we know groups
- Methods/data and reporting routes
- Worked chart example and contextual definitions
- Stable view/appearance links with no research-filter serialization
- Accurate saved-analysis action label

## Governance and reproducibility

Status: implemented with explicit outstanding decisions.

- Public correction contact and reusable template
- README, suggested citation and license status
- Current-data map and CSV header index
- Accessibility limitations
- CRediT/GAIDeT activity mappings, updated history and validation log

## Decisions recorded

- Correction contact: Ian G. Williams, ian.williams52@gc.cuny.edu; GitHub profile https://github.com/perldiver. No reply time or repository promised.
- New code and analysis licenses await Ian’s specification; original posts retain separate rights.
- Event/kiosk mode and public hosting are not priorities for this local research release.
- Institutional endorsement remains unconfirmed.

## Remaining work

- Requester-specified licenses
- Stakeholder verification of institutional status, editorial history and missing appointments
- Actual human usability and contributor review
- Fully annotated data dictionary
- All-chart PNG exports
- Optional event mode and hosted release

## Corrections to the additional simulation

The live app already embeds its data rather than fetching explorer_data.json. The primary model is k=8, seed 42, with k=10 retained as an alternative. Existing source and credit explanations are being made easier to reach. Filenames do not prove human coding; no readership data support a “most-read” post. Historical before/ files remain unchanged as preservation evidence.

Actual direct file execution could not be browser-tested because the available browser tool rejects file:// URLs. HTTP navigation and embedded-data checks are recorded separately.


## External review provenance clarification · November 2, 2026

Ian G. Williams identified the supplied review as produced by **Deepseek V4.1 Flash 1017**, running in the **CAIL sandbox in OpenWebUI**, from a **ZIP export of a previous project iteration**. This is distinct from the two Codex sub-agent simulations and Codex implementation work. The model/environment provenance is requester-reported, not independently verified from external session logs. The exact input ZIP filename, hash and iteration identifier are not recorded. The review document’s stated manifest-level inspection limits remain relevant; its recommendations were checked against current source files. None of these simulations establishes actual human user testing.


## Subsequent thematic visualization extension

Implemented the requested thematic heatmap, keyword co-occurrence, writer bars, source lists/exports and title/tag theme filter for the index/network. The six essay headings are shown only for their 19 selected examples, with counts rather than prevalence. Details and remaining verification limits are recorded in the work log.


The thematic release has 45 passing automated tests and recorded HTTP browser checks. The saved word corpus and model outputs remain unchanged; the new thematic evidence is a separate derived artifact. Direct-file and narrow-screen execution limits remain as documented in process/validation.json.